QuantumWise Forum
May 19, 2013, 02:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Boundary Conditions for above and below the gate for my DEVICE?  (Read 812 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ash
Regular ATK user
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

India India

Posts: 24



View Profile
« on: May 4, 2012, 07:29 »

Can anyone tell me the general criteria for about the boundary conditions for device with gate enabled? I am using the Boundary condition as shown in the attached file corresponding to my device geometry. Is it correct ?
Can you please tell me the effect of dirichlet boundary conditions at the top of the gate (top(B)) and dirichlet at the bottom(bottom(B))?
« Last Edit: May 8, 2012, 12:37 by Ash » Logged
hzkvictory
Regular ATK user
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

China China

Posts: 18


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2012, 02:42 »

I am very interested in this problem as well.
according to  http://quantumwise.com/documents/tutorials/latest/GrapheneDevice/index.html/chap.transmission_spectrum.html#vnl.transmission_spectrum.save
It seems that the device all have Diriklet condition on C direction, and the metallic and dielectric region needs Neumann condition on A,B direction.

and  I would like to know if the device is constructed wiht graphene sheet (not graphene ribbon as above shows) and spatial region. what would it be?
Logged
Nordland
QuantumWise Staff
Supreme ATK Wizard
*****

Reputation: 14
Offline Offline

Posts: 730



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 1, 2012, 00:16 »

Can anyone tell me the general criteria for about the boundary conditions for device with gate enabled? I am using the Boundary condition as shown in the attached file corresponding to my device geometry. Is it correct ?
Can you please tell me the effect of dirichlet boundary conditions at the top of the gate (top(B)) and dirichlet at the bottom(bottom(B))?

Hey Ash.

I digged out a calculation I did some time ago of a similar system, that might spread some light on this matter. Starting with the bottom gate:
since your gate is pretty much covering the entire bottom face (making it effectively dirichlet), you will only see little effect of what you choose here. If you set it to dirichlet, then every point in the bottom that is not covered by your gate will be forced to zero. This will make the effect of the gate very localized in space in the A,B plane, but all in all this does not really matter in this simulation.

The choice for the top plane matters a lot. If you set it to dirichlet, you force the electrostatic potential to be zero at the top and by doing so, you will force the electric field strength to be gate voltage over length of cell in that direction. The electric field strength would be very strong, in other word the gate potentials has too drop off much faster. If you set it to Neumann, the field strength can vary and the potential drop off can be as long as required,
so if the desired is to model vacuum at the top, i would personally go with Neumann there.
Logged
Ash
Regular ATK user
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

India India

Posts: 24



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 1, 2012, 13:59 »

Thanks Norland, for detailed and effective reply !!  Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!